|
|
Post by COZZA on Jul 28, 2014 10:37:22 GMT 10
As the title asks, what should the member ranks be as each person levels up a rank with their posts.
Need names and post count needed to get to each rank.
The names should be relatable to the forum and not just random.
Thanks,
COZZA.
|
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Jul 28, 2014 15:58:30 GMT 10
0-20: Reader
20-50: Semi-Active
50-100: Active
100-500: Very Active
500-1000: Amazingly Active
1000-1500: Super Active
1500---: So Active, You Can't Rank Up
|
|
|
|
Post by COZZA on Jul 28, 2014 16:42:15 GMT 10
0-20: Reader 20-50: Semi-Active 50-100: Active 100-500: Very Active 500-1000: Amazingly Active 1000-1500: Super Active 1500---: So Active, You Can't Rank Up I do like the suggestions, they are too much about activity though. |
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Jul 28, 2014 16:47:28 GMT 10
Not sure what other labels are related to discussion, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by COZZA on Jul 28, 2014 17:06:18 GMT 10
Not sure what other labels are related to discussion, though. Me either. I have enlisted the help of google and have worked out all the ranks. I wont make them known, but they are perfect. |
|
|
|
Post by number1jf on Jul 28, 2014 17:10:01 GMT 10
Why not make them known? Only me, you & Sri can see this anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by COZZA on Jul 28, 2014 17:15:06 GMT 10
I'll PM you both with the ranks. I've also got some custom groups to go with those ranks.
|
|
